Navorsingsbevindings Bitcoin Mynbou is gelykstaande aan 0.10% van globale kweekhuisgasvrystellings

By Bitcoin.com - 1 jaar gelede - Leestyd: 3 minute

Navorsingsbevindings Bitcoin Mynbou is gelykstaande aan 0.10% van globale kweekhuisgasvrystellings

According to a recent report published by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF), bitcoin mining worldwide accounts for around 0.10% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or 48.35 million tons of carbon dioxide per annum. Moreover, CCAF’s report details that “Bitcoin’s environmental footprint is more nuanced and complex” and because of complexity issues it “underscores the need for independent data.”

Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance Study: ‘Bitcoin Network Produces 48.35 Million Tons of CO2 per Annum’

Dinsdag het die Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) 'n nuwe verslag called “A deep dive into Bitcoin’s environmental impact,” which was written by the CCAF project lead Alexander Neumueller. The report highlights how bitcoin’s increasing popularity has put a spotlight on “environmental issues associated with the production of Bitcoin. "

CCAF’s study claims that the Bitcoin network produces 48.35 million tons of carbon dioxide per annum. The metric equates to roughly 0.10% of global greenhouse gas emissions and Neumueller says it’s about “14.1% lower than the estimated GHG emissions in 2021.”

Neumueller’s research further details that 37.6% of the energy leveraged by bitcoin (BTC) mynwerkers afkomstig is van volhoubare tipes energie. CCAF se “beste raai-skatting” van 0.10% van die wêreldwye kweekhuisgasvrystellings is gelyk aan dieselfde hoeveelheid energie wat deur Nepal of die Sentraal-Afrikaanse Republiek gebruik word.

Bitcoin mining energy represents a touch less than half of the 100.4 million tons of carbon dioxide gold mining uses per year. Neumueller believes that the GHG emissions in 2022 were lower than in 2021 because of a “substantial decrease in mining profitability.”

CCAF merk op dat die afname moontlik was tydens 'n verskuiwing van minder doeltreffende mynboere na meer doeltreffende volgende-generasie masjiene. Neumueller sê dat CCAF se aanname “bevestig is deur anekdotiese getuienis of Bitcoin miners.”

Mynwerkers ervaar druk vanuit drie hoeke: Val BTC price, increasing hashrate & operating costs. Rev per hash is close to the '20 lows, and energy costs are rising, ASICs more efficient though. This year might separate the wheat from the chaff, consolidation ahead? pic.twitter.com/WRqbTD8raG

— Alexander Neumüller (@alexneumueller) Junie 16, 2022

In addition to changing out old hardware for newer and more efficient bitcoin miners, CCAF details that when China’s hashrate declined, the crypto asset’s “electricity mix became more diverse.” Neumueller and CCAF explain that data suggests the use of sustainable energy has declined in recent times.

Starting in 2021, data shows electricity mix fluctuations are now “visibly less” volatile. “Since it is not yet possible to comment on how the emission intensity changed from 2021 to 2022, as only January data is currently available, Bitcoin’s average emission intensity in 2020 (491.24 gCO2e/kWh) was compared to that of 2021 (531.81 gCO2e/kWh), suggesting that the sustainability of the electricity mix has deteriorated,” Neumueller notes.

The CCAF report surmises that the bitcoin mining industry is ever-changing and the CCAF research and tools continue to be adjusted. With real-world data available researchers are able to look at the situation with “greater granularity.”

The CCAF project lead ends the study by mentioning that “interesting concepts and developments are already emerging around bitcoin mining.” These include concepts like mitigating fakkelgas, afval hitte herwinning, en toegepas eis reaksie aansoeke.

“Time will tell if these are merely novel ideas that fail to deliver on their promise, or if they will become a more integral part of the Bitcoin mining industry in the future,” Neumueller’s report concludes.

Wat dink jy van die nuutste? bitcoin mining report published by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Oorspronklike bron: Bitcoin. Met