By Bitcoinist - 1 bhliain ó shin - Am Léitheoireachta: 4 nóiméad
Amhrán Jimmy Agus Samson Mow vs. Vitalik Buterin, Cath Royale ag LABITCONF
The fact that Jimmy Song and Samson Mow were in the same bill as Vitalik Buterin was interesting enough, but the actual panel was the equivalent of an atomic bomb blowing the stage up. What started as a discussion about the FTX collapse and saga, turned into a heated debate about bitcoin Vs. Ethereum pretty quickly. It was a spectacle. And Song and Mow ensembled into some kind of bitcoin killing machine right before our eyes.
Let tús ag an tús, áfach.
Besides the already mentioned characters, Ripio’s Juan Llanos and Kraken’s Alejandro Palantzas completed the panel. The moderators were Rodolfo Andragnes and Diego Gutiérrez Zaldívar, Co-founder of the Bitcoin Argentina NGO. At first, Llanos tried to explain the FTX saga in a polite way. It was a stressful situation and mistakes were made, he said. However, Samson Mow wasn’t having it. “The main problem is that they built their business on a sh*tcoin,” he said. Vitalik laughed. Everything was fine.
"The main problem is that they built their business on a shitcoin", explains @sármhaitheas faoi #FTX's collapse at the main stage of @labitconf
Inis dóibh, Boss! #LABITCONF @EAN3com @BFXLeosESP pic.twitter.com/WIcvVSL0gU
— Javier ₿astardo @ (@criptobastardo) Samhain 11, 2022
Dar le Mow, “ní raibh baint ar bith aige seo le rialtóirí. Bhí FTX go mór i leaba le rialtóirí,” rud is pointe iontach. Ba é Sam Bankman-Fried aghaidh sucking suas go dtí an rialtas a dhéanamh ar an tionscal crypto ar fad níos cairdiúla don rialtóir. Cá seasann an ghluaiseacht sin anois? Ina dhiaidh sin, chuaigh Jimmy Song níos airde fós agus dúirt sé gur tharla sé sin go léir, ach is í an fhíorfhadhb ná úsáid a bhaint as seirbhísí láraithe mar chaomhnóirí. Mar a deir an seanfhocal: Ní hé do chuid eochracha, ní do bhoinn.
Go dtí seo, chomh maith. Ach bhí teannas san aer cheana féin…
Amhrán Jimmy Agus Samson Mow vs. Vitalik Buterin
Finally, it was Vitalik’s turn. He criticized Bankman-Fried’s megalomania and compared the FTX billboards and the stadium naming to the behavior of dictators from the last century. Vitalik explained how the FTT racket worked, and Samson Mow dropped the bomb. Mow said that a lot of what Vitalik was saying also applies to Ethereum and all hell broke loose.
Rinne an modhnóir, Diego Gutiérrez Zaldívar, iarracht rudaí a choinneáil dírithe ar FTX ach theip air. Bhí an cat as an mála. D’iarr Gutiérrez Zaldívar ar Samson Mow an sainmhíniú ar “sh* tcoin” agus rinne an t-iar-Blocstream cur síos ar Ethereum agus a fheidhmiú agus Vitalik ag faire le míchreideamh. “Is í an fhadhb le sh * tcoins ná go ligeann siad orthu go bhfuil siad díláraithe agus iad ag rith ar Amazon, den chuid is mó, agus ní féidir le duine ar bith nód a rith.”
'Shitcoin' definition, by @sármhaitheas @ @labitconf #LABITCONF @EAN3com pic.twitter.com/CYIeSKTcCA
— Javier ₿astardo @ (@criptobastardo) Samhain 11, 2022
De réir Jimmy Song, ba é fíorcheacht tubaiste an FTX ná go gcaithfidh daoine iad féin a choinneáil agus a n-idirbheart féin a fhíorú, tréimhse. Cháin Song cultúr Altcoin maidir le muinín agus gan a fhíorú. “Caithfidh tú a fháil amach conas do chuid stuif féin a fhíorú, agus mura bhfoghlaimíonn tú an ceacht sin beidh tú ar fad scriosta. Níl ann ach ceist ama.”
Since it was two against one, Gutiérrez Zaldívar took it upon himself to protect Vitalik and Ethereum. He didn’t do a very good job. He gave Alejandro Palantzas the word and Palantzas said there’s a reason companies like Kraken and Coinbase are still in business 10 years later. They have resisted the temptation to print their own token or “sh*tcoin,” and “they didn’t do it because it’s morally wrong.” According to Palantzas, all the scammers in the space don’t understand what bitcoin i ndáiríre. Bitcoin “is freedom, it’s liberty.”
Cairt praghsanna BTC do 11/16/2022 ar Bitstamp | Foinse: BTC / USD ar TradingView.comDéanann Mow Comparáid idir Altcoin World agus Casino
When Samson Mow defined “sh*tcoins,” he said that they advertised themself as decentralized when they had an obvious issuer. Vitalik challenged him asking if Satoshi was bitcoin’s issuer. Mow responded that what Satoshi did was set up a number of rules that a lot of people followed, which is not the same as being a central issuer. Neither Mow nor Song stated the obvious, that Satoshi is not among us while Vitalik and other altcoin CEOs are. And their influence over the protocols they preside over is immense.
Bhí an bua ba mhó ag Vitalik ar an oíche agus é ag caint ar fhéinchoinneáil a dhéanamh áisiúil do ghnáthdhaoine. Chuaigh sé an bealach taitneamhach don slua agus dúirt sé gur cheart don tionscal ar fad oibriú le chéile chun é sin a dhéanamh, agus phléasc an pobal. Dúirt Mow, contrártha le creideamh an phobail, go raibh sé éasca féinchoimeád. Ní mór do dhaoine ach treoracha an sparán crua-earraí a leanúint. Chuaigh Jimmy Song níos faide agus dúirt sé mura bhfuil daoine sásta an iarracht a dhéanamh agus cúpla rud a fhoghlaim, nach bhfuil “airgead féin-cheannasach” tuillte acu.
Chomh maith leis sin, chuaigh Song le haghaidh scornach cruthaitheoir Ethereum ag rá "Tá a fhios agam nach bhfuil tú ag iarraidh é seo a chloisteáil, tá a fhios agam gur mhaith leat do chuid airgid a thabhairt do Vitalik." Chuige sin, d'fhreagair Vitalik nach bhfuil muinín aige fiú as Vitalik lena chuid airgid, agus mhínigh sé socrú a sparán il-sig 4/6. A bhí greannmhar, ach seachain an cheist fíor. An bhfuil sé i lár Ethereum nó nach bhfuil?
Chun deireadh a chur leis an bpainéal corraitheach ach thar a bheith spraíúil, dhún Gutiérrez Zaldívar lena bhua is mó ar an oíche. Dúirt sé gur féidir le gach duine smaoineamh ar na ceisteanna oscailte, “toisc nach bhfuil an fhírinne againn, nílimid ach ag roinnt ár mbealach smaointeoireachta.”
Mar sin cad a cheapann tú?
Featured Image: Song, Mow, and Buterin at LABITCONF, by Ed. Prospero | Charts by TrádálaViewFoinse bunaidh: BitcoinIs é