By Bitcoin 雑誌 - 1 年前 - 閲覧時間: 5 分
いかがでしょうか Bitcoin規制当局を規制しますか？
Bitcoiners who are optimistic about Senate cryptocurrency legislation should remain skeptical of the legislators who want to regulate the industry.
これはNiklasKleinworthによる意見編集です、公共政策シンクタンクであるアイダホ自由財団の研究助手。
As Congress seeks to refine the federal government’s stance on cryptocurrency, one must be wary of policies that permit favoritism of the interests of bureaucrats over Bitcoiners. Though Bitcoin itself cannot be regulated, federal control could stunt progress in オレンジピリング nocoiners by making bitcoin less practical to access and exchange. Bitcoiners should support legislation that both simplifies the industry’s relationship with the U.S. government and offers protections against bureaucratic overreach.
上院議員シンシア・ルミスとカーステン・ギリブランド 暗号通貨法 非常に 予想 and celebrated milestone in the industry as it recognizes the role that bitcoin plays in the U.S. economy and offers a regulatory framework for many of the gray areas that have plagued government interactions with the business of bitcoin。このうち、 手形 would designate the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as the regulatory body for cryptocurrency matters, define bitcoin as a commodity rather than a security, and improve market transparency for stablecoins. This approach could lead to more innovation and greater adoption of bitcoin as it is applied to everyday transactions.
Despite the merits of the bill, Bitcoiners should be skeptical about this new policy direction in Washington, D.C., as a regulatory framework is no more restrictive on bureaucratic agencies than the edges of a blank canvas for a painter. The Lummis-Gillibrand bill トゥット the creation of this framework but fails to implement any protections against the very entity that is threatened by the Bitcoin ethos of decentralizing wealth and rendering fiat obsolete: the federal government. By imposing a regulatory framework without implementing guards against bureaucratic overreach, the industry will be no safer after this bill is passed than it is today. In fact, one can argue the industry will be less safe because bureaucrats will be allowed to focus their regulatory efforts on the industry instead of fighting each other for control.
ルミス上院議員は 議論する しばらくの間暗号通貨法を可決しましたが、最近のその可決の推進は投資家によって推進されているようです 逃げる to the government for rescue after the liquidation crisis of the last few months. Proponents of more regulation are not the everyday HODLers who believe in the principle of decentralized wealth and financial freedom. Rather, they are the modern-day gold prospectors attempting to leverage the get-rich-quick ploys of altcoins to expand their wealth in fiat. Yet, their cries for regulation are presented as consensus from the cryptocurrency industry, incidentally sweeping Bitcoiners into the new regulatory scene despite their noninvolvement in the crisis.
In Bitcoin’s truly trustless system of financial accountability, there is no need for regulation. Because of this, there really is no need to regulate the remainder of the cryptocurrency market either. Consumers hate nothing more than being scammed. As altcoin fads come and go, it becomes apparent that bitcoin has staying power and investors will eventually stop supporting failing, unstable and pseudo-decentralized coins. If there is anything that we have learned over the past two months, it is that Bitcoin is the model for laissez-faire capitalism operating in a self-regulated system.
自由市場に存在する問題の究極の解決策として政府を探すことは非常に危険です。 特に、同じ規制当局による悪い市場管理に対応する製品の耐久性の低さが問題の原因である場合。
The issue with additional regulation of cryptocurrency exchanges is that the government would acquire more tailored control of the market and limit financial freedom. This effect is especially potent as bitcoin integrates with the market by becoming a payment option for the average consumer. Businesses, not bitcoin, will become the target as few of them would be willing to risk the consequences for defying government overreach.
Bitcoin is designed to be the escape hatch from the federal government’s poor management of the market. At present, 歴史的 インフレは、車で通勤したり、XNUMX日XNUMX食を食べるなどの通常の活動を実質的に高額なものにしている。 その間、連邦準備制度は危険なほど近くにあります 過剰修正 the situation, threatening to send the economy into a recession that could rival what we experienced in 2008. Given this track record, it would be unwise to grant the present stewards of the American economy any control of people’s access to their only means of escape.
Though the Lummis-Gillibrand bill is a start to clarifying the law and recognizing bitcoin as a viable store of value, there needs to be provisions that protect the industry from the regulators themselves. There should be protections that recognize your right to own and keep your bitcoin, limit the latitude executive agencies have when interpreting their role within the regulatory framework, and recognize one’s right to financial privacy as guaranteed by the fourth amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Regulating the regulators would limit overreach and support the rights to financial privacy and property in their most perfect form.
One should remember that bitcoin is not intended to be an ordinary investment, but a movement built on the principle that financial freedom should be accessible to all and absent market manipulation by any government, company, group or individual. Investors voluntarily calling for the restriction of this right are holding bitcoin for the wrong reasons and entirely miss the point of this grand experiment.
Bitcoiners must not only HODL their bitcoin on the basis of their belief that it is a superior store of value. They must also apply this principle to the sphere of public policy: “Politically HODLing” on the basis that bitcoin requires no regulation as the superior trustless system it is. It is important to both support public policies that clarify the law, encourage innovation and open the market, while opposing those that create inroads for bureaucrats to regulate at will. Without this political vigilance, Bitcoiners are in danger of losing the culture war between the Fed and true financial liberty.
これは、ゲストの投稿です ニクラス・クラインワース。 表明された意見は完全に独自のものであり、必ずしもBTCInc.または Bitcoin マガジン。
元のソース： Bitcoin 雑誌