By Bitcoin ວາລະສານ - 3 ເດືອນກ່ອນ - ເວລາອ່ານ: 12 ນາທີ
ເປັນຫຍັງຂ້ອຍຈຶ່ງເປັນ Nostr Maximalist ແລ້ວ
After being inspired by a podcast ກັບ Preston Pysh and Will Casarin in January of 2023 I experienced my first interaction with ‘the nostr’ using a rather clunky interface. Since that time, nostr has gradually become more user friendly and an increasingly meaningful part of my life. I have now deleted all other social media accounts in favor of this blossoming decentralized alternative. My slow exodus away from centralized social media started over ten years ago, but the formation of a functional substitute was the final nail in the coffin. Making the jump at such an early stage may have been premature, but after two months using both nostr and Twitter I chose to make the transition permanent. I’ve written this article to explain my reasoning and provide an assessment of the nostr network as I understand it today.
Nobody is in charge of nostr, I have no one to ask if NOSTR should be capitalized or lowercase. I also have not reached a definitive conclusion regarding how it should be pronounced. Frankly it wouldn’t matter if anyone had an opinion about either of those things. Nostr is what the users and developers make it. Nostr is not a website and it is not a company. Nostr does not rely on a blockchain to function and there are no central servers dictating who can participate in the network. With the exception of shared interest and lightning ‘zap’ integration, it is independent from Bitcoin. Those who already understand Bitcoin seem to have an easier time wrapping their head around the importance of nostr, but I have also met several non-bitcoin who are passionate about what is being built.
Nostr is a protocol which is designed to have applications built on top of it, or rather to interface with it. Users are free to choose from dozens of applications (clients) to access the protocol. The client they choose determines the nature of the user experience. The name NOSTR is an acronym for Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relay. The functionality of the protocol is in the name, but I will not be diving into the technicalities here. I also will not be discussing the pros and cons of the various clients used to access nostr. Though that would be a helpful resource if someone would like to write that up!
ໃນຖານະທີ່ເປັນຜູ້ທີ່ກະຕືລືລົ້ນທາງດ້ານເຕັກນິກທີ່ບໍ່ມີເສລີພາບທີ່ສຸມໃສ່ເຕັກໂນໂລຢີ, ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າໄດ້ເຂົ້າຮ່ວມ Nostrasia ໃນເດືອນພະຈິກຂອງ 2023 ດ້ວຍຄໍາຖາມຕົ້ນຕໍຢູ່ໃນໃຈ; "ແອັບພລິເຄຊັນໃດທີ່ບໍ່ສາມາດເຮັດຊ້ໍາໄດ້ໃນ nostr?" ໃນຈຸດນີ້, ມີຄວາມບໍ່ຮູ້ຫຼາຍເກີນໄປທີ່ຈະຕອບຂໍ້ສະຫຼຸບນີ້, ແຕ່ຄວາມເຂົ້າໃຈຂອງຂ້ອຍກ່ຽວກັບ nostr ແລະຄໍາຮ້ອງສະຫມັກທີ່ມີທ່າແຮງຂອງມັນໄດ້ຂະຫຍາຍອອກໄປຢ່າງຫຼວງຫຼາຍໃນໄລຍະເວລາຂອງຂ້ອຍຢູ່ໃນໂຕກຽວ. ກອງປະຊຸມໄດ້ປະກອບມີການສົນທະນາກ່ຽວກັບການສະບັບແບ່ງຂັ້ນຂອງເກືອບທຸກຄໍາຮ້ອງສະຫມັກທີ່ທ່ານສາມາດຈິນຕະນາການ. Twitter, Twitch, Youtube, Reddit, Spotify, Maps, Amazon, GitHub, Goodreads ແລະອື່ນໆ. ບໍ່ມີທາງເລືອກທີ່ມີການແບ່ງຂັ້ນຄຸ້ມຄອງເຫຼົ່ານີ້ແມ່ນການສຳເນົາຄາບອນຂອງການບໍລິການເຫຼົ່ານັ້ນ. ໃນຫຼາຍວິທີທີ່ພວກເຂົາເບິ່ງຄືວ່າມີທ່າແຮງທີ່ຈະກາຍເປັນສະບັບທີ່ດີກວ່າເນື່ອງຈາກການເຊື່ອມໂຍງຂອງຟ້າຜ່າແລະການປ້ອນຂໍ້ມູນຜູ້ໃຊ້ແບບເປີດ.
ບາງຄັ້ງຂ້ອຍກໍ່ສົງໄສວ່າສິ່ງທີ່ຖືກສ້າງຂື້ນໃນທີ່ສຸດຈະກາຍເປັນການກະຈາຍອໍານາດໃຫມ່ຂອງອິນເຕີເນັດທັງຫມົດ. ເທົ່າທີ່ເປັນຂໍ້ຈໍາກັດໃນປະຈຸບັນ, ສິ່ງທ້າທາຍຕົ້ນຕໍທີ່ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າໄດ້ຍິນໄດ້ຖືກສົນທະນາຢູ່ nostrasia ແມ່ນການສ້າງ nostr ທຽບເທົ່າສໍາລັບສັນຍານຫຼື telegram. ການສົນທະນາທີ່ເຂົ້າລະຫັດສ່ວນຕົວອາດຈະຖືກແກ້ໄຂໂດຍບາງສິ່ງບາງຢ່າງເຊັ່ນ: SimpleX. ໃນເວລານີ້ມັນບໍ່ຊັດເຈນວ່າຄໍາຮ້ອງສະຫມັກໃນການພັດທະນາຈະປະສົບຜົນສໍາເລັດຫຼືສາມາດຂະຫຍາຍໄດ້, ແຕ່ຍ້ອນຄວາມກ້າວຫນ້າທີ່ຂ້ອຍໄດ້ເຫັນໃນຊ່ອງນັບຕັ້ງແຕ່ການເຂົ້າຮ່ວມ, ຂ້ອຍຮູ້ສຶກກະຕືລືລົ້ນ.
ຫລີກໄປທາງຫນຶ່ງ optimism, ມັນເປັນໄປໄດ້ hypothetically ວ່າ nostr ຈະບໍ່ຢູ່ລອດໄດ້ດົນພໍທີ່ຈະບັນລຸຈຸດປະສົງອັນກ້າຫານທີ່ໄດ້ຖືກສະເຫນີໃນປັດຈຸບັນ. ມີສິ່ງທ້າທາຍດ້ານການເງິນ ແລະ ດ້ານວິຊາການຫຼາຍຢ່າງຢູ່ຂ້າງໜ້າ. ມັນເປັນໄປໄດ້ວ່າຂ້ອຍເຮັດຜິດພາດໃນການວາງໄຂ່ nostrich ທັງຫມົດຂອງຂ້ອຍຢູ່ໃນກະຕ່າຫນຶ່ງ. ການເລືອກນັ້ນບໍ່ແມ່ນສໍາລັບທຸກຄົນ ແລະຂ້າພະເຈົ້າຮູ້ສຶກຂອບໃຈຢ່າງຄົບຖ້ວນ. ຢ່າງໃດກໍ່ຕາມ, ໂດຍໄດ້ລໍຖ້າທາງເລືອກທີ່ມີການແບ່ງຂັ້ນຄຸ້ມຄອງແລະເປີດເຜີຍສໍາລັບສື່ມວນຊົນສັງຄົມເປັນເວລາຫລາຍປີ, ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າເຕັມໃຈທີ່ຈະເອົາຄວາມສ່ຽງທີ່ກ່ຽວຂ້ອງກັບການຮັບຮອງເອົາເຕັກໂນໂລຢີນີ້ໃນຕອນຕົ້ນ. ຂ້ອຍຈະປະສົບກັບການໂຕ້ຕອບຜູ້ໃຊ້ທີ່ບໍ່ສະອາດແລະມີທ່າແຮງທີ່ຈະຜ່ານຄວາມອຸກອັ່ງຫຼາຍກວ່າການສືບຕໍ່ເອົາພະລັງງານຂອງຂ້ອຍເຂົ້າໄປໃນລະບົບທີ່ຂ້ອຍເຫັນວ່າລ້າສະໄຫມ.
ທຸກໆທາງເລືອກມີຄວາມສ່ຽງ. ເມື່ອເວົ້າເຖິງການຄຸ້ມຄອງຊັບສິນ, ຄວາມສ່ຽງຂອງການຈັດສັນທຶນທາງດ້ານການເງິນທີ່ບໍ່ດີມີຜົນສະທ້ອນຢ່າງຮ້າຍແຮງແລະຖາວອນ. ໃນກໍລະນີຂອງສື່ມວນຊົນສັງຄົມ, ຄວາມສ່ຽງຂອງການຈັດສັນທຶນສັງຄົມທີ່ບໍ່ດີແມ່ນໄດ້ຮັບການສັງເກດ, ແຕ່ຢ່າງຫຼວງຫຼາຍຫນ້ອຍ. ຄວາມຈິງແມ່ນວ່າໂດຍການໃຊ້ແພລະຕະຟອມສື່ສັງຄົມທີ່ເປັນສູນກາງ, ທ່ານໄດ້ເສຍສະລະການຄວບຄຸມທຶນສັງຄົມໃດໆທີ່ທ່ານໄດ້ໃຊ້ຈ່າຍ. ໃນເວລາໃດກໍ່ຕາມ, ເວັບໄຊທ໌ນັ້ນສາມາດປ່ຽນນະໂຍບາຍຂອງມັນໃນທາງທີ່ສົ່ງຜົນກະທົບທາງລົບຕໍ່ທ່ານຫຼືພວກເຂົາສາມາດລຶບບັນຊີຂອງທ່ານຕາມການຕັດສິນໃຈຂອງຕົນເອງ. ການເຊື່ອມຕໍ່ແລະເນື້ອໃນທັງຫມົດທີ່ທ່ານໄດ້ພັດທະນາຢູ່ໃນເວທີເຫຼົ່ານັ້ນແມ່ນຫ້ອຍຢູ່ຕາມຄວາມຕັ້ງໃຈຂອງບໍລິສັດຂະຫນາດໃຫຍ່ແລະການແຊກແຊງຂອງລັດຖະບານ. ໂດຍສ່ວນຕົວແລ້ວ, ຂ້ອຍມີຄວາມເຊື່ອໃນລະຫັດແຫຼ່ງເປີດຫຼາຍກວ່າທີ່ຂ້ອຍເຮັດຢູ່ໃນສະຖາບັນມະນຸດ.
ໃນເວລາທີ່ການສ້າງຕົວຕົນໃນ nostr, ລາຍເຊັນເຂົ້າລະຫັດແມ່ນຄົນອັບເດດ: ສໍາລັບທ່ານໂດຍ magic ອິນເຕີເນັດ open-source (ເທົ່າທີ່ໃຈ pleb ຂອງຂ້ອຍສາມາດກວດສອບໄດ້). ລາຍເຊັນນີ້ມີລະຫັດສ່ວນຕົວ ແລະສາທາລະນະ, ເອີ້ນວ່າ nsec ແລະ npub ຕາມລໍາດັບ. npub ຄ້າຍຄືອັນຂ້າງລຸ່ມ ແລະສາມາດໃຊ້ເພື່ອຊອກຫາຜູ້ໃຊ້ອື່ນໄດ້:
npub1jfn4ghffz7uq7urllk6y4rle0yvz26800w4qfmn4dv0sr48rdz9qyzt047 (add me 🧡🫂💜)
The npub is a novel form of online identification which is not required to be linked to your meatspace identity in any way. The nsec is used to sign in to new clients and to prove that you are the owner of the account; similar to bitcoin private keys. This key pair can be used anywhere in the nostrverse to prove that you are a particular individual or account. Follows, followers, and posted content are associated with a npub through the relays that npub is using. This means that if you are interested in trying out a new client or migrating away from the one you are using you may do this without any loss of connections or content.
ວິທີການແບບໃໝ່ນີ້ຕໍ່ກັບຕົວຕົນອອນໄລນ໌ແລະການເກັບຮັກສາຂໍ້ມູນສ້າງພື້ນທີ່ແຂ່ງຂັນຫຼາຍກວ່າເກົ່າສໍາລັບນັກພັດທະນາທີ່ສ້າງແອັບພລິເຄຊັນ, ແຕ່ຍັງເຮັດໃຫ້ສາມາດເຮັດວຽກຮ່ວມກັນໄດ້. ສອງປັດໃຈທີ່ ສຳ ຄັນທີ່ຂາດຫາຍໄປໃນພູມສັນຖານສື່ສັງຄົມໃນປະຈຸບັນ. behemoths ສື່ມວນຊົນສັງຄົມໃນປະຈຸບັນແມ່ນອີງໃສ່ຄວາມຈິງທີ່ວ່າມັນເປັນສິ່ງທ້າທາຍທີ່ຈະອອກໄປແລະມີຄວາມຫຍຸ້ງຍາກໃນການສື່ສານລະຫວ່າງເວທີ. ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າໄດ້ລຶບເຟສບຸກຂອງຂ້າພະເຈົ້າກ່ອນຫນ້ານີ້ແລະສໍາລັບການຫຼາຍເດືອນໄດ້ຮັບອີເມລ໌ກ່ຽວກັບການ ‘ຄິດເຖິງທ່ານຫຼາຍປານໃດ! ເບິ່ງສິ່ງທີ່ເຂົາເຈົ້າໂພສເມື່ອບໍ່ດົນມານີ້.' ແນ່ນອນ, ຂ້ອຍຈະຖືກບັງຄັບໃຫ້ເຂົ້າສູ່ລະບົບຄືນໃໝ່ເພື່ອເບິ່ງເນື້ອຫາ. ການຫມູນໃຊ້ທາງອາລົມຢ່າງດຸເດືອດ ແລະ ສິ້ນຫວັງຫຼາຍຈົນກະເພາະອາຫານ. Nostr ມີທ່າແຮງທີ່ຈະລົບລ້າງຮູບແບບສວນທີ່ມີກໍາແພງທີ່ຊີວິດດິຈິຕອນຂອງທ່ານຖືກຈັບເປັນເຈົ້າພາບສໍາລັບລາຍໄດ້ໂຄສະນາແລະການເກັບກໍາຂໍ້ມູນ.
ນອກເຫນືອຈາກບັນຫາໂຄງສ້າງກັບສື່ມວນຊົນສັງຄົມທີ່ເປັນມໍລະດົກ, ມັນເປັນທີ່ຊັດເຈນວ່າ censorship ອອນໄລນ໌ແມ່ນເພີ່ມຂຶ້ນຢ່າງສູງ. ຢ່າງໃດກໍຕາມ, ທ່ານອາດຈະມີຄວາມຮູ້ສຶກກ່ຽວກັບການເຊັນເຊີໃນເວລາທີ່ມັນເກີດຂຶ້ນກັບຄົນທີ່ທ່ານບໍ່ເຫັນດີນໍາ, ທ່ານຈະບໍ່ມັກມັນໃນເວລາທີ່ censors ເປີດທ່ານ. ບາງຄົນຊື່ນຊົມການເຊັນເຊີເພາະວ່າມີເນື້ອຫາຫຼາຍຢ່າງທີ່ພວກເຂົາຈະບໍ່ເຫັນ. ສ່ວນບຸກຄົນ, ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າຢາກຈະເລືອກດ້ວຍຕົນເອງແທນທີ່ຈະມີບາງບໍລິສັດທີ່ບໍ່ມີໃບຫນ້າທີ່ບໍ່ມີສາຍບໍລິການລູກຄ້າເຮັດໃຫ້ມັນສໍາລັບຂ້ອຍ.
Ultimately the social media giants have been placed in an impossible position. Legislators will not stop pushing them to maintain the ປ່ອງຢ້ຽມ Overton in their favor. Whether a social media provider wishes to be a propaganda tool or not, the nature of any centralized platform will ensure that it becomes one. Centralized dissemination of what is ‘appropriate content’ and what is considered ‘misinformation’ will inevitably narrow the scope of human understanding to a point where self-censorship is the norm. To a large extent this has already happened.
Some believe that misinformation is the most dangerous aspect of the internet. Allowing people to communicate freely in an open marketplace of ideas is too much to bear for these people. They feel the need to control what people say and by extension control what people think. This fear based need for control over the population does not align with my values. Despite the inevitable failure of such approaches in the age of the internet, we will likely see an increase in attempts to KYC (know-your-customer) everyone on centralized networks. The social credit system in China has provided the world with a case study to be weary of. When your bank card gets declined at the grocery store for a meme you re-posted on Xitter don’t say I didn’t warn you. Have I already become a toxic nostr maxi?... Maybe. 🧡🫂💜
Michel Foucault’s writings on disciplinary power outline a methodology towards an essentially non-violent oppression of the masses. Looking at his conceptualization and the current state of affairs in the social media landscape, I have a difficult time telling them apart. The final result of such a system is a society in which authentic connection and genuine behavior become impossible. Physical prisons are only one form of enslavement. The true prison of the dystopian future manifests inside the mind of the individual. Bitcoiners who have watched their personal time preference expand understand this intuitively.
There are people in the bitcoin community who see nostr as a distraction and there are people in the nostr community who see bitcoin as an impediment to adoption. All I see is a massive synergistic upward spiral between the orange badger and the purple ostrich. These two protocols feed each other and enable ກໍລະນີການນໍາໃຊ້ໃຫມ່ which culminate in something much greater than the two independent parts. Bitcoin is essential for shifting the world away from debt slavery into proof of work. Nostr is essential for shifting the world away from top down dissemination of information to a free market of content. In this way the two technologies are ideologically aligned with volunteerism and personal liberty.
ຫຼາຍທີ່ສຸດ bitcoin would agree that financial freedom is essential in maintaining one’s personal agency. However, without the ability to communicate freely the new found financial liberation is handicapped. The ability to reliably coordinate commerce and correspond in a peer-to-peer fashion is much more essential than many seem to acknowledge at this moment. Additionally, the reason the fiat system is so potent in its deception is not exclusively a result of the accountants and politicians engaged in the fraud. The real strength of the fiat leviathan is a function of global propaganda efforts to maintain the perpetual delusion. If hyperbitcoinization occurs and the propaganda apparatus remains in place, most people are unlikely to benefit from its liberating qualities. In order for the full impact of bitcoin to take root on this planet we will also need a means of sharing information openly and efficiently.
All of this rhetoric is a bit grandiose for the moment given that the estimates I have received regarding daily active users ranges around 10,000. It could be that this article and the protocol itself will age poorly, but many of the concepts in this article will remain relevant to the importance of a decentralized method of mass communication. If nostr fails, something will take its place. Given the development I have witnessed so far, I would be surprised to see nostr fall flat. The protocol is drawing in talent and checking off bounties at an exponential rate. As the bitcoin price increases I anticipate this trend to continue. Those who believe that bitcoin is a distraction to nostr underestimate the electromagnetism of the bull market. Those who believe that nostr is a distraction from bitcoin didn’t meet the former ethereum dev at nostrasia who became a bitcoiner because of nostr. The purple pill helps the orange pill go down.
ໃນລະດັບຫົວຂໍ້ຫຼາຍ, ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າໄດ້ສັງເກດເຫັນປະສົບການຂອງຜູ້ໃຊ້ທີ່ດີຂຶ້ນຢ່າງຫຼວງຫຼາຍໃນ nostr ກ່ວາຂ້າພະເຈົ້າໄດ້ຢູ່ໃນລະບົບມໍລະດົກ. ຜົນກະທົບແມ່ນຊັດເຈນຫຼາຍທີ່ຂ້ອຍສາມາດເວົ້າໄດ້ວ່າສຸຂະພາບຈິດຂອງຂ້ອຍໄດ້ປັບປຸງຢ່າງເຫັນໄດ້ຊັດນັບຕັ້ງແຕ່ຂ້ອຍອອກຈາກ Twitter. ມີຫຼາຍຕົວແປທີ່ຂ້ອຍສາມາດອ້າງເຖິງການປັບປຸງນັ້ນ. ການຂາດ algorithms enraging, ຂະຫນາດທົ່ວໄປຂອງຊຸມຊົນທີ່ຂ້ອຍກໍາລັງພົວພັນກັບ, ຄວາມສົນໃຈຮ່ວມກັນຂອງຊຸມຊົນນັ້ນ, ຫຼືຄວາມເຂົ້າໃຈທີ່ມີສະຕິທີ່ຂ້ອຍມີອິດສະຫຼະທີ່ຈະເວົ້າສິ່ງໃດກໍ່ຕາມທີ່ຂ້ອຍຕ້ອງການ. ບໍ່ວ່າມັນເປັນແນວໃດ, ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າບໍ່ແມ່ນຜູ້ດຽວທີ່ໄດ້ສັງເກດເຫັນ vibe ທີ່ດີກວ່າຢູ່ໃນ nostr ໄດ້.
ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າໄດ້ສັງເກດເຫັນວ່າບາງບັນຊີ Twitter ທີ່ມີຊື່ສຽງບໍ່ໄດ້ຂ້ອນຂ້າງເປັນທີ່ນິຍົມໃນ nostr ແລະບາງບັນຊີທີ່ຮູ້ຈັກຫນ້ອຍກໍ່ໄດ້ຮັບການດຶງດູດ. ປະຈຸບັນຂ້ອຍມີຜູ້ຕິດຕາມຫຼາຍກວ່າທີ່ຂ້ອຍເຄີຍເຮັດໃນ Twitter (A whopping 1400). ບາງບັນຊີຂະຫນາດໃຫຍ່ໃນ Twitter ກໍາລັງແບ່ງປັນໃນລະດັບສ່ວນບຸກຄົນຫຼາຍຂຶ້ນໃນ nostr ກ່ວາພວກເຂົາເຮັດຢູ່ໃນເວທີໃຫຍ່. ຜົນກະທົບເຫຼົ່ານີ້ອາດຈະບໍ່ຢູ່ແບບນີ້ເມື່ອເຄືອຂ່າຍເຕີບໂຕ, ແຕ່ໃນເວລານີ້ມັນຮູ້ສຶກວ່າບາງຄົນທີ່ຂ້ອຍມັກແມ່ນສາມາດເຂົ້າເຖິງໄດ້ແລະສະດວກສະບາຍກວ່າທີ່ຈະແບ່ງປັນຢ່າງເປີດເຜີຍກັບຊຸມຊົນ nostr.
Earlier in my bitcoin journey I was of the opinion that the greater diversity of viewpoints I could interact with, the more comprehensive my understanding of the world would become. I was cautious of ending up in a filter bubble or an echo chamber of certain niche opinions. As time went on I made a point to exclusively follow people on twitter who were outspokenly ‘Bitcoin Only’. This provided a simple heuristic for me to narrow my field of interactions to people who had put in enough work to jump the hurdle out of the clown coin casino. I remain realistic about the possibility that I have intentionally manufactured confirmation bias in my online experience, but with the impending AI boom it will become increasingly difficult to remain in an unfiltered social pool.
By narrowing my online interactions to a specific group I run the risk of missing out on unique opinions, but so far this pruning has continuously increased the signal in my feed while reducing the noise. The scope of nuanced perspectives between bitcoin on nostr has provided me with plenty to consider and learn from. In any case I still get a daily dose of intellectual debris to sort through from the normies I talk to in meatspace. When it comes to my online life, I concluded I would rather spend time getting to know this merry band of internet pioneers than stay connected to the rest of the traditional social media system.
Some have suggested that by leaving legacy social media I might be surrendering to irrelevance and obscurity. Personally I see the exodus of bitcoin from Xitter gradually culminating in that network fading into irrelevance. I give credit to those of you who remain in the fray to fight the good fight, but my days engaging in that digital mosh pit are over. While my own learning process was accelerated by debates on Twitter, nine times out of ten I don’t see productive outcomes from online arguments. What I have found productive and rewarding has been interacting with people who are passionate enough about freedom to roll the dice on this new protocol.
ມັນເປັນໄປໄດ້ຫຼາຍທີ່ທຸກຄົນໃນຕົ້ນໆການເຄື່ອນໄຫວນີ້ຈະຖືກ doxxed. ຢ່າງໃດກໍຕາມ, ໃນໄລຍະຍາວພວກເຮົາສະຫນັບສະຫນູນເຕັກໂນໂລຢີທີ່ຈະຊ່ວຍໃຫ້ຄົນລຸ້ນຕໍ່ໄປມີອິດສະລະໃນການເລືອກວ່າພວກເຂົາຮັກສາຄວາມເປັນສ່ວນຕົວຫຼາຍປານໃດແລະຂໍ້ມູນທີ່ພວກເຂົາແບ່ງປັນກັບໂລກ. ພວກເຮົາກໍາລັງເຮັດໃຫ້ອະນາຄົດທີ່ປະຊາຊົນມີເສລີພາບທີ່ຈະເປັນຂອງແທ້ຈິງຕາມທີ່ພວກເຂົາຕ້ອງການໂດຍບໍ່ມີຂໍ້ຈໍາກັດປອມກ່ຽວກັບຂອບເຂດຂອງການສະແດງອອກຂອງມະນຸດ.
ການຢູ່ໃນ nostr ໃນປີ 2023 ຮູ້ສຶກຄືກັບການຫຼິ້ນເກມກ່ອນການຈັດງານລ້ຽງທາງອິນເຕີເນັດທີ່ຍິ່ງໃຫຍ່ທີ່ສຸດທີ່ໂລກເຄີຍເຫັນ. ລະບົບສຽງມີຂໍ້ບົກພ່ອງບາງຢ່າງ, ການຕົກແຕ່ງຍັງຢູ່ໃນຂັ້ນຕອນ, ແລະບໍ່ມີໃຜຮູ້ແນ່ນອນວ່າມີໃຜຈະສະແດງ, ແຕ່ວິນຍານແມ່ນສູງ. ຂ້ອຍມັກຈະສົມທຽບສະຖານທີ່ເຊັ່ນ Xitter ແລະ F-book ທີ່ມີແຖບ dive crappy ທີ່ທຸກຄົນໄປພຽງແຕ່ຍ້ອນວ່າທຸກຄົນໄປບ່ອນນັ້ນ. ຫຼາຍຂຶ້ນທີ່ເຂົາເຈົ້າເຕະຄົນອອກ, ນ້ໍາດື່ມ, ແລະຂຶ້ນລາຄາ; ຫຼາຍພວກເຂົາຈະໄລ່ລູກຄ້າຂອງພວກເຂົາອອກໄປ. ຂ້າພະເຈົ້າບໍ່ໄດ້ຂຽນບົດຄວາມນີ້ເພື່ອໃຫ້ຜູ້ໃດອັບອາຍຫຼືກົດດັນໃຫ້ເຂົາເຈົ້າເຂົ້າຮ່ວມ nostr, ແຕ່ຖ້າຫາກວ່າມັນເປັນຈຸດປະກາຍໃຫ້ທ່ານຮຽນຮູ້ເພີ່ມເຕີມ, ຈຸດປະສົງຂອງຂ້າພະເຈົ້າໄດ້ສໍາເລັດ. ບໍ່ມີຄວາມຮີບຮ້ອນ, ແຕ່ເມື່ອທ່ານຕັດສິນໃຈວ່າເຈົ້າເບື່ອກັບສະຖານະການທີ່ເປັນຢູ່, ພວກເຮົາຈະລໍຖ້າເຈົ້າດ້ວຍການເປີດແຂນ.
This is a guest post by Source Node. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin ນິຕະຍະສານ
ແຫຼ່ງຕົ້ນສະບັບ: Bitcoin ວາລະສານ