By Bitcoin.com - 2 کاله وړاندې - د لوستلو وخت: 4 دقیقې
د ویکیمیډیا بنسټ د چاپیریال اندیښنو په اړه د کریپټوکرنسی بسپنه منلو بحث کوي
د چاپیریال اندیښنو له امله د کریپټو بسپنو د بندولو لپاره د موزیلا پریکړې وروسته، د ویکیمیډیا فاؤنڈیشن ټولنې یو شمیر غړو یو وړاندیز وړاندې کړی چې له بنسټ څخه یې غوښتي چې د ډیجیټل اسعارو بسپنه ودروي. وړاندیز تشریح کوي چې د کریپټو بسپنې "د کریپټو اسعارو د ځای تایید نښه کوي،" او دا هم وايي چې "کریپټو اسعارو ممکن د چاپیریال پایښت لپاره د ویکیمیډیا بنسټ ژمنې سره سمون ونلري."
د وړاندیز ادعا cryptocurrencies ممکن د ویکیمیډیا بنسټ سره سمون ونلري
Members of the Wikimedia Foundation are voting on a proposal that could stop the foundation from accepting digital currencies like bitcoin and ethereum. The U.S. non-profit منل یې پیل کړل crypto assets in 2019 via Bitpay. “We accept donations globally, and we strive to provide a large variety of donation options. It’s very important that we can get international donations processed in ways that are efficient and cost-effective,” Pats Pena, director of payments and operations at Wikimedia Foundation said at the time.
په هرصورت، الف وړاندیز submitted by the user dubbed “Gorillawarfare” claims that accepting crypto donations goes against specific Wikimedia Foundation principles. “Cryptocurrencies may not align with the Wikimedia Foundation’s commitment to environmental sustainability. Bitcoin and ethereum are the two most highly-used cryptocurrencies, and are both proof-of-work, using an enormous amount of energy,” the proposal says.
While the proposal mentions the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index it leverages a lot of the research done by the Digiconomist’s Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index. The proposal seems to have a lot of support as voting members left comments signaling affirmation. “Long overdue. Accepting cryptocurrency makes a joke out of the WMF’s commitment to environmental sustainability,” Wikimedia user Gamaliel said. However, not everyone agreed and in fact, there are a great number of people who voiced the opposite opinion. In reply to Gamaliel’s statement, for instance, one person wrote:
ایا تاسو خبر یاست چې دودیز بانکداري سیسټم هم انرژي کاروي؟
انفرادي ټینګار کوي 'هر ټکی غلط او / یا ګمراه کونکی دی'
There is some discussion from a few people’s submitted comments that insists Wikimedia Foundation members should realize the U.S. dollar is backed by significant amounts of carbon energy او worst of all, state-enforced violence. One person explained that each point that Gorillawarfare brought up in the proposal “is untrue and/or misleading.” For example, the point about being aligned with the crypto industry’s so-called values. The individual retorted that “this is not true, any more than accepting USD signals endorsement of the U.S. Dollar or the U.S. Government.”
In reply to the environmental concerns Gorillawarfare introduced in the proposal, the individual explained that the proposal’s point is conflated. “The proposal conflates the existence of Bitcoin to merely using it,” the Wikimedia Foundation member Awwright opined. “The proposal does not demonstrate that dropping acceptance of Bitcoin (or other cryptocurrency) will actually have an effect. As a technical matter, there is no direct relationship between making a Bitcoin transaction and energy usage (that’s significantly more than the domestic banking system).”
تبصره کونکي د ډیجیکونومیسټ څخه تعصب ته ګوته نیسي
Furthermore, there are many complaints about Gorillawarfare citing the Digiconomist, as the researcher’s work has been widely dismissed over inaccuracies and extreme bias. “Digiconomist is a blog run by Alex de Vries, who is an کارمند of De Nederlandsche Bank NV (DNB), the central bank of the Netherlands, which is a direct competitor to Bitcoin,” one of the comments against Gorillawarfare’s proposal notes. Another individual explained that the Digiconomist’s work is غلط, as many others have discovered, and the Digiconomist’s work is loaded with discrepancies. One individual wrote:
Digiconomist یوازې متعصب او متضاد نه دی. ډی ویریز پخپله خپور شوی ، د اداریي بیاکتنې پروسه نلري او هغه د حقیقت چیک کولو او دقت لپاره ضعیف شهرت لري.
د لیکلو په وخت کې، یو شمیر اشخاص شتون لري چې د ګوریلاوارفیر لخوا وړاندې شوي وړاندیز سره مخالف دي، مګر د رایو او نظرونو لویه برخه د نظر ملاتړ کوي. داسې بریښي چې د کریپټو ټولنه او د پروف- آف کار (PoW) پلویان باید د هغه خرافاتو لرې کولو لپاره سخت کار وکړي چې د اصلي رسنیو پانډیتونو ، زاړه مالي ساتونکي ، او تادیه شوي اپوزیسیون څیړونکو څخه خپریږي.
تاسو د ویکیمیډیا فاؤنڈیشن وړاندیز په اړه څه فکر کوئ چې وړاندیز کوي بنسټ د چاپیریال اندیښنو په اړه د کریپټو شتمنیو منل ودروي؟ اجازه راکړئ پوه شو چې تاسو د لاندې نظرونو برخه کې د دې موضوع په اړه څه فکر کوئ.
اصلي سرچینه: Bitcoin.com