By Bitcoin.com - 1 ano atrás - Tempo de leitura: 4 minutos
Postagem no blog do BCE insiste que isto é 'Bitcoin'Última resistência', autoridades afirmam que o BTC está caminhando para a 'irrelevância'
On Wednesday, Nov. 30, 2022, a blog post published by the European Central Bank (ECB) discusses bitcoin and the authors Ulrich Bindseil and Jürgen Schaaf seem to believe its “bitcoin’s last stand.” The ECB authors further say that while bitcoin’s price has consolidated and stabilized, the central bank officials remarked that “it is an artificially induced last gasp before the road to irrelevance.”
Members of Europe’s Central Bank Believe They Predicted Bitcoin Would Be Heading Toward ‘Irrelevance’ Before FTX Went Bust
Two members of Europe’s central bank, Ulrich Bindseil, the director general of the ECB’s market infrastructure and payments division, and Jürgen Schaaf, an advisor to the ECB’s payments sector, published a blog post about the leading crypto asset bitcoin (BTC).
A postagem no blog do BCE chama-se “Bitcoin’s Last Stand”, e os escritores afirmam que o criptoativo está se tornando irrelevante. Bindseil e Schaaf explicam que BTC’s price has dropped 76% lower than the $69K all-time high, and the authors have noticed bitcoin proponents think BTC está tomando um “respiro no caminho para novas alturas”.
The ECB authors do not believe this will be the case this time around. “More likely, however, it is an artificially induced last gasp before the road to irrelevance,” the ECB blog post’s authors insist. “And this was already foreseeable before FTX went bust and sent the bitcoin price to well below USD16,000.”
The members of the European Central Bank further opine that “bitcoin has never been used to any significant extent for legal real-world transactions.” The ECB’s blog post adds:
Bitcoin is also not suitable as an investment. It does not generate cash flow (like real estate) or dividends (like equities), cannot be used productively (like commodities) or provide social benefits (like gold). The market valuation of Bitcoin is therefore based purely on speculation.
ECB Officials Say Banks That Promote Bitcoin Bear ‘Reputational Risk,’ Blog Post Insists Regulation Does Not Represent ‘Approval’
The authors don’t necessarily use the terms, but Bindseil and Schaaf relate bitcoin to a Ponzi or pyramid scheme, as the authors stress that “speculative bubbles rely on new money flowing in.”
"Grande Bitcoin investors have the strongest incentives to keep the euphoria going,” the blog post’s writers insist. While regulatory policy has grown around cryptocurrency assets, the two ECB officials believe that “regulation can be misunderstood as approval.” Bindseil and Schaaf are not too keen on the idea that the crypto space should be allowed to innovate “at all costs.”
Bitcoin’s innovative value, the ECB authors say has been very little compared to the risks that allegedly outweigh innovation. The ECB paper states:
Em primeiro lugar, essas tecnologias até agora criaram um valor limitado para a sociedade – não importa quão grandes sejam as expectativas para o futuro. Em segundo lugar, o uso de uma tecnologia promissora não é condição suficiente para agregar valor a um produto baseado nela.
Lastly, the central bank executives think that banks that promote bitcoin will bear reputational risk. The ECB members say that because they believe bitcoin is not a suitable investment nor a payment system, “it should be treated as neither in regulatory terms and thus should not be legitimised.”
A postagem no blog de Bindseil e Schaaf é muito semelhante às opiniões de pessoas como Peter Schiff, Charlie Munger, e as centenas dos chamados bitcoin obituários publicado ao longo dos anos. Apesar do post de opinião do BCE, há muitos indivíduos, trabalhos acadêmicos e empresas que discordam veementemente dos dois executivos do banco central.
O líder global de blockchain da EY, Paul Brody, recentemente dito que este inverno criptográfico é um “inverno criptográfico muito mais ameno do que o anterior”. Brody também disse que as flutuações dos preços das criptomoedas estão afetando muito menos o crescimento da indústria atualmente. “Pela primeira vez, os altos e baixos de preços não têm um impacto tão grande no crescimento de longo prazo da indústria”, opinou Brody.
Além disso, uma papel published by Matthew Ferranti, a Harvard Ph.D. candidate in economics, says that banks should hold a little bitcoin. Ferranti said that even central banks should consider holding bitcoin, and more specifically, central banks struggling with financial sanctions depending on the financial institution’s accessibility to gold reserves.
What do you think about the ECB’s blog post about Bitcoin’s so-called ‘last stand?’ Do you agree with the officials from Europe’s central bank? Let us know your thoughts about this subject in the comments section below.
Fonte original: Bitcoin.com