By Bitcoinist - pred 10 meseci - Čas branja: 3 minuti
Pro-XRP Lawyer ponuja ključno rešitev za RipplePravne težave proti SEC
Jeremy Hogan, odvetnik za XRP, je razpravljali the issue of secondary market sales and its potential impact on the Ripple vs. the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit.
Izid tega primera je ključnega pomena za imetnike XRP, saj bo določil, ali se sredstvo sam po sebi šteje za vrednostni papir. Če se vprašanje prodaje na sekundarnem trgu ne obravnava, bi to lahko vplivalo na ponovno uvrstitev XRP na borze, kot je Coinbase.
Tožba SEC nakazuje, da je XRP vrednostni papir, kot je delnica. Vendar pa zahteve SEC glede sodišča v tožbi izrecno ne zahtevajo ničesar, kar bi sredstvu podelilo ta status. To pušča vprašanje prodaje na sekundarnem trgu pod vprašajem.
Disgorgement Order Could Force Ripple vs. SEC Case To Address Secondary Sales Issue
SEC je obtožila Ripple with violating securities laws by selling XRP as an unregistered security. If Ripple is found to have violated securities laws, it could be required to pay disgorgement, which would oblige the company to give up profits gained through illegal or unethical means.
However, Hogan suggests that Ripple could obtain an agreement from the SEC to include language in its final decision that the judgment does not cover secondary sales.
Hogan argues that the court must determine who receives the funds taken from Ripple in a disgorgement order. Disgorgement is a legal remedy that requires a defendant to give up profits gained through illegal or unethical means.
Furthermore, the Pro-XRP lawyer suggests that Ripple could argue that only actual purchasers from it directly, not secondary purchasers, should receive their investment back in a disgorgement order. This argument is based on the SEC v. Wang case, in which a court ruled that disgorgement should only be paid to those who purchased a security from the defendant.
If the court agrees with Ripple’s argument, it would mean that only those who purchased XRP directly from Ripple would be entitled to receive their investment back. This would exclude secondary market purchasers, such as those who bought XRP on exchanges.
This could be a positive outcome for Ripple, as it could limit the financial impact. It could also help to clarify the legal status of XRP, as it would confirm that XRP is not inherently a security.
Priznanje SEC o statusu žetona v primeru LBRY bi lahko imelo pozitivne posledice za XRPNa preteklem zaslišanju v knjižnici (LBRY), omrežje za plačevanje datotek, ki temelji na verigi blokov, proti tožbi SEC, je okrožno sodišče ZDA poslušalo ustne argumente o uporabi pravnih sredstev. Sodnik se je moral odločiti, ali lahko kripto sredstvo, ki lastniku omogoča pošiljanje navodil v omrežje, vključuje naložbeno shemo podjetja. SEC je želel, da sodnik izda široko sodno prepoved prodaje žetona LBRY, v kateri žeton postane vrednostni papir.
Vendar je bilo zaslišanje dobra novica, zlasti za XRP. John Deaton, amicus curiae v tožbi XRP, je prav tako predložil amicus brief v primeru LBRY. Odvetnik SEC v tožbi LBRY priznan that the secondary market sales of LBC tokens do not constitute a security. The judge ruled that the secondary market transactions of LBRY tokens by people unaffiliated with no investment intent in the LBRY case are legal.
The LBRY case sets a precedent that could benefit Ripple and XRP holders, confirming that secondary market transactions do not constitute securities. If the Ripple vs. SEC judge follows a similar line of reasoning, it could mean that XRP is not inherently a security, as secondary market sales are an essential part of cryptocurrency trading and do not represent an investment scheme by the company.
Predstavljena slika iz iStocka, graf s TradingView.com
Izvorni vir: Bitcoinje