By Bitcoin Majalah - 2 sababaraha taun ka pengker - Waktos Bacaan: 7 menit
Bitcoin And The Philosophy Of Free Choice
Bitcoin allows people to opt out of systems not designed to their benefit, and creates a “network state” of like minded thinking.
The profoundness filsafat ilaharna diukur dina extremities na diversions ti titik sentral dipikaharti. Ieu bisa alamat pamikiran koléktif, atawa individu, nalika nyawalakeun pangaweruh jeung pangalaman jeung niat ngamekarkeun pamahaman muluk tina subjek di leungeun, atawa positing parobahan nyata jeung langgeng. Peta jalan pikeun ulikan sapertos kieu: Kahiji, urang nangtukeun masalah sistem. Kadua, urang nangtukeun solusi pikeun sistem. Katilu, urang nerapkeun solusi anu ngamungkinkeun urang kana sistem anyar. Nuturkeun jalur ieu, urang mimitina kudu ngartikeun titik sentral urang dipikaharti, atawa masalah.
Masalahna Duit
Ieu sanés paguneman "emas digital" biasa anjeun, kami bakal kaluar tina kotak ieu ayeuna. Henteu masalah alignment pulitik hiji urang, sadaya jelema dasarna bisa satuju sistem rusak. Tapi naon "sistem" anu urang rujuk? Hiji sistem tiasa nanaon ti urutan anjeun nyiapkeun diri isuk-isuk, nepi ka mesin dipaké pikeun salajengna pamahaman kami fisika kuantum.
Naha urang hartosna sistem kauangan? Yakin, éta muterkeun kana eta. Inflasi nonstop, easing kuantitatif tumuwuh, ongkos repo bade tingkat pernah-samemeh-katempo, pasti keuangan geus ngalakonan jeung eta. Tanggapan vaksin Covid-19 kirang ti anu anjeun pikahoyong? Tanggapan pendidikan umum pikeun pandém global henteu kondusif pikeun kahayang anjeun? Naha moratorium nyéwa ngan ukur tiasa ngalambatkeun hutang anu beku? Ayub henteu pernah nelepon anjeun deui nalika anjeun dianggap henteu penting? Henteuna Jaminan Sosial pikeun pangsiun anjeun nyababkeun patarosan eksistensial ngeunaan sarat anu ditaroskeun ngeunaan panghasilan anjeun? Panginten éta ngan kanyataan yén anjeun henteu tahan peryogi lisénsi pikeun unggal "kabébasan" anu anjeun pikirkeun. Nya, saha anu ngatur sadayana ieu?
Masalahna Nyaeta Nagara
Ieu sanés manifesto pikeun anarkisme, sanaos kuring ngumbara ngadeukeutan éta unggal dinten. Masalahna nyaeta nagara geus gagal kami. Finansial, birokrasi, umumna, sareng pinuh, nagara parantos gagal kami. Alesan pikeun kagagalan ieu nyaéta insentif. Insentif pikeun ngalayanan rahayat mayoritas dina sistem geus ngejat jeung mayoritas amassed kabeungharan jauh leuwih saeutik ti minoritas, sarta minoritas reigns salaku mahluk pangluhurna. Perda didamel dina beurat kas anu beurat.
Dina standar fiat, jawabanna sok langkung: langkung seueur percetakan, langkung seueur bailout, langkung seueur potongan pajak, langkung easing kuantitatif, langkung seueur jaminan, langkung seueur pajeg, langkung seueur, langkung seueur, sareng seueur deui. Dina ékosistem hutang, urang ngan bakal naekeun siling.
Lamun sistem mangrupa kaayaan, sarta fiat suluh sistem ku sahingga minoritas malire mayoritas alatan kurangna sora dina sistem aya, lajeng kaluar sistem. Ieu brings kami ka solusi.
Solusina Kaluar Nagara
Gampang nyarios tibatan dilakukeun, henteu? Henteu deui. Ieu henteu sasederhana "upami anjeun henteu resep teras angkat." Kaluar nagara, atanapi kaluar tina sistem anu aya, henteu hartosna atanapi ngadorong pembatalan lengkep nagara. Kaluar tina kaayaan ngan hartina milih milih kaluar tina sistem dirancang ngalawan anjeun, sarta opting kana sistem anu dirancang pikeun anjeun.
Dina saméméhna artikel, I spoke on how “Fiat Is The State”, and “Bitcoin Is Stateless.” Without rehashing what either of those statements means, let’s just assume they are true. Fiat currencies are beholden to their states, and bitcoin is beholden to no one, it is “stateless.”
Theoretically, if our problem is the state, and the antithesis of the state is being anti-state, or “stateless,” then Bitcoin stands as the logical solution to the existing problem as it allows you to exit the current system by utilizing its global network to exit the given system of your state.
meuli bitcoin isn’t enough to fix the system, it simply allows the individual gratification of successfully exiting a system weighted against you, and this is only if one follows in the path of becoming sovereign over their own wealth, as the purchase of a coin does not constitute a full exit. How then do we accomplish this for the collective, rather than the individual? How do we implement sovereignty?
Ngalaksanakeun Solusi Kadaulatan
Potongan ieu sanés walkthrough téknis sapertos netepkeun titik atanapi ngajelaskeun kumaha dompét jalan. Gantina, urang bakal difokuskeun solusi pikeun koléktif, tinimbang individu. Kumaha urang ngalengkepan kaluar koléktif tina sistem ayeuna? Hiji jalma dina hiji waktu.
The first premise must be understood. There is a problem, and that problem is the state. Bitcoin allows individuals to operate outside of the bounds of any surrounding state (go read that artikel from earlier if you still haven’t), making Bitcoin the solution, or the exit from a system. To implement exiting the system, you must first be capable of truly exiting the system. Most individuals are not yet fully capable of a complete exit of the system, and that is okay. We don’t need to all do it; we may not even need to do it all. We must simply be willing to if we need it. What does it mean to exit the system?
Bitcoin functions as a global currency, backed by the efforts put into maintaining the network by nodes and miners. Nodes are basically just people with a computer that validates transactions. Miners actually solve the encryption used by Bitcoin by expending electricity. This expenditure of tangible resources allows us to associate a value based on the resources spent. This system exists outside of the state, as the state has no power over the protocol. The state cannot decide to create more bitcoin, only a network consensus can do that. The state cannot hide transactions because Bitcoin is a public ledger that keeps everyone accountable. Any node can check any transaction that has ever happened. Owning your own coins, taking the sovereign leap, and taking control of your own coins with self-custody, and being able to function with a fungible currency anywhere in the world, that… is exiting the system.
Sakali cukup individu geus nyokot kaluar maranéhanana sistem, teu sagemblengna abandoning eta, atawa ninggalkeun, tapi ku ngilikan hiji asset anyar, maranéhanana ayeuna bisa aya di luar nagara. Ayeuna, hiji jalma, hiji koin, hiji dompét, bisa jadi teu jadi perhatian pangbadagna nagara. Sanajan kitu, éta 30, atawa 40% warga atawa leuwih sanggup hiji kaluar, atawa ngancam hiji kaluar, lajeng sugan nagara jadi daék ngadangukeun. Panginten, pikeun kéngingkeun aset énggal ieu anu anjeun tahan dina sistem anu teu tiasa dirampa, aranjeunna nyiptakeun langkung insentif pikeun anjeun hoyong milih deui kalayan sababaraha ganjaran. Panginten éta mangrupikeun réstrukturisasi sadaya sistem, sareng panginten cara anu lami dibuang kana liang anu poék tina kagagalan manusa, anu diserat dina téks anu diajar ngeunaan masa depan, nyarioskeun waktos anu leungit sareng paburencay.
Pikeun ngécéskeun éta sakedap, kaluar tina sistem babarengan, sareng damel aranjeunna damel pikeun anjeun balik deui. Sakali ieu lumangsung, urang pindah ka idéal panungtungan dina ngungudag kadaulatan ieu. Ayeuna urang kedah ngagentos sistem, tapi nganggo naon?
The Network State Versus A Network State
Ieu dua cita-cita anu misah anu ngagambarkeun ideologi anu béda-béda. Salah sahijina nyaéta ayeuna, sareng ampir sadayana anu urang laksanakeun, sedengkeun anu sanésna mangrupikeun masa depan anu teu jauh teuing.
"A Network State" mangrupa hal anu geus ngapopulérkeun ku Balaji Srinivasan. Anjeunna boga pamadegan yén kakuatan tawar koléktif individu kawas-dipikiran anu disiapkeun kaluar sistem bisa ngadalikeun hiji pamadegan heartily-weighted nu hese malire. Anjeunna nyarioskeun kamungkinan koléktif anu bersuara ieu earn statehood, pooling aset, mésér sipat, sareng nyiptakeun komunitas maya sareng fisik sorangan di jero, atanapi di luar nagara-nagara khusus.
“The Network State” is something else entirely. It’s the nomenclature of collective consensus:the ideas that permeate within each individual that steps out of the current system. Once a Bitcoiner becomes a Bitcoiner, they then enter into the collective consensus, or “The Nation State of Bitcoin” (if you will).
"The Network State" ngamungkinkeun pikeun pamikiran koléktif jeung tumuwuhna dituluykeun dina cita-cita ogé kauntungan sejenna countless. "A Network State" mangrupakeun manifestasi tina komunitas digital anu diakuan dina kapasitas resmi. "A Network State" sanes sarat tapi paling assuredly jalur kami diatur kana. "The Network State" nyaeta imperatif, henteu, penting pikeun nyoko hareup.
"Negara Jaringan" kedah dilahirkeun tina anu kagolong kana "Negara Jaringan." Tapi janten bagian tina "The Network State," henteu meryogikeun pangakuan kana "A Network State." Baca deui.
This choice is inherent and arguably dogmatic of Bitcoin. A requisite to enter a network state after exiting the existing system stands in opposition to the ideology of freedom deeply rooted in the protocol. To enter the system of a network state requires the absolute release of the previous system, but also requires the absence of any system.
Duanana ninggalkeun sistem aslina jeung kurangna butuh nu anyar, naon méré hiji pilihan leres individu dina nyoko sistem anyar. Tanpa pilihan, anjeun ngan saukur kapaksa ningkatkeun sistem analog anjeun pikeun anu digital.
Ieu pos tamu ku Shawn Amick. Pamadegan dikedalkeun sagemblengna sorangan sarta teu merta ngagambarkeun pamadegan BTC, Nyarita atawa Bitcoin majalah.
sumber aslina: Bitcoin majalah