By Bitcoin میگزین - 1 سال پہلے - پڑھنے کا وقت: 5 منٹ
Bitcoin کان کن موجود نہیں ہیں - لیکن Bitcoin توثیق کرنے والے کرتے ہیں۔
کالنگ bitcoin معدنیات bitcoin validators will improve the public's perception on Proof of Work (PoW) and prevent the framing effect from occurring.
This is an opinion editorial by Doc Sharp, a bitcoin product designer currently funded by Spiral to contribute to various bitcoin FOSS projects.
It's not a stretch of truth to anyone who's been around the digital assets space for a while that almost every project, except the industry’s magnum opus bitcoin, succeeds in constructing effective public relations to sell their صرف نام میں وکندریقرت (DINO) پروجیکٹ یہ کوئی تعجب کی بات نہیں ہے کیونکہ پچھلے کئی سالوں میں جمع ہونے والے دسیوں اربوں کو کہیں جانا پڑا تھا، اور یہ یقینی طور پر نئی جدید ٹیکنالوجی کی تعمیر کے لیے نہیں گیا تھا۔
ایک علاقہ جو bitcoin has fallen short in the public relations department, and the focus of this piece, is in the framing of how blocks are validated, colloquially called proof-of-work (PoW) or mining.
سب سے پہلے، کان کنی کیسے کام کرتی ہے؟
ایک مختصر میں bitcoin miners use PoW, which uses energy, to find a needle in a haystack. When they find the needle, they use it to create and add a new block to Bitcoin's blockchain. When this new block is added, the miner gets rewarded with newly minted bitcoin. To date, this is the most decentralized means to achieving network consensus and creating valid blocks. More on bitcoin کان کنی یہاں.
Bitcoin mining is like finding a needle in a haystack.Bitcoin Mining And The Framing Effect
ایک ایسی دنیا میں جہاں سرمایہ کو ماحولیاتی، سماجی اور گورننس (ESG) کے اسکورز جیسے معیارات سے ہدایت کی جاتی ہے، نئی ٹیکنالوجی کو اپنانے میں سبز بیانیے تیزی سے اہم ہوتے جا رہے ہیں۔
Knowing this, the perceived high energy costs of bitcoin mining and the term mining itself, which is associated with environmental destruction, has become a barrier to bitcoins adoption and a red herring used by DINO projects to discredit bitcoin and pump their bags.
Relatively speaking though, bitcoin mining's energy usage is quite small and is زیادہ تر سبز. لوگ ان حقائق کو ماضی میں دیکھنے کی وجہ ایک علمی تعصب کی وجہ سے ہے جسے کہا جاتا ہے۔ ڈھانچہ اثر.
"The framing effect is a cognitive bias where people decide on options based on whether the options are presented with positive or negative connotations."
مدت کان کنی comes with many negative connotations (see image below). With other digital assets available that promise similar solutions to bitcoin with a much smaller environmental footprint, naïve users in many cases will choose them over bitcoin due to the framing effect.
کان کنی سن کر لوگ یہ سوچتے ہیں۔
I won't get into the details in this piece, but the "greener" solution proof-of-stake (PoS) is ایک قابل عمل متبادل نہیں ہے and will inevitably lead to centralization. Though with the complexities underpinning both PoW and PoS, it's no surprise that people make choices due to superficial reasons, such as naïve views on energy.
ایک نفسیاتی نظریہ جو فریمنگ اثر کو کم کرتا ہے اسے کہا جاتا ہے۔ امکان نظریہ وضاحت کرتا ہے کیوں:
"The prospect theory holds that individuals are more influenced by the possibility of a loss than the prospect of an equivalent gain."
Most people don't understand that the gain of PoW (More energy use, but decentralized) is greater than the loss of PoS (Less energy use, but centralized). Although it's easy to understand the loss from a purely environmental perspective.
یہ اس حقیقت سے بڑھ گیا ہے کہ آج لوگوں کی اکثریت موسمیاتی تبدیلی کو ایک سنگین شکل میں دیکھیں سماجی مسئلہ اور سنسنی خیز ٹکڑے جیسے "Bitcoin Uses More Electricity Than Many Countries. How Is That Possible?" باقاعدگی سے گردش کریں. اس طرح فریمنگ اثر ظاہر ہوتا ہے کیونکہ افراد کو صرف ایک فریم (ماحولیاتی) کا سیاق و سباق دکھایا جاتا ہے۔
So, what can we do to overcome the framing effect and have people realize bitcoin mining isn't going to boil the oceans and is actually a good use of energy? We could take a note out of DINO handbook and leverage narratives that have less negative connotations associated with them to our benefit.
How could this be applied to bitcoin mining? Well ...
Let's Call Bitcoin کان کنوں ، Bitcoin تصدیق کرنے والے
Ethereum 2.0 کے انضمام کے ساتھ، Ethereum PoW کے ساتھ کان کنی سے PoS کے ساتھ validators کے استعمال کی طرف منتقل ہو گیا ہے۔ کان کنی اور کان کن جیسا کہ ہم جانتے ہیں کہ وہ اب Ethereum پر موجود نہیں رہیں گے، اور 99.5% تک کے دعوے توانائی کے استعمال میں کمی کا حوالہ دیا گیا ہے۔
These energy savings are a red herring as it comes at the cost of decentralization. Decentralization is a fundamental first principle of cryptocurrencies, without it they are useless. A centralized public cryptocurrency's energy usage, even if tiny, is 100% wasted as the network has failed. Bitcoiners know this, and it's why they will کبھی نہیں کوڈ کو تبدیل کریں.
So, back to the framing effect. The term validators has much more positive connotations towards it due to DINOs marketing efforts, and it's not as loaded of a term as mining. Less negative connotations means people will perceive the term more positively. Avoiding the framing effect by using a more media friendly term like validator will make it easier for people to understand the gain of PoW (More energy use, but decentralized) is greater than the loss of PoS (Less energy use, but centralized).
DINO has done all the work here by shifting the narrative to being PoS > PoW. The least we can do is leverage this effort for our benefit as they have done time and time again using the bitcoins brand to justify their Rube Goldberg machine.
So, calling bitcoin معدنیات، bitcoin validators can prevent the framing effect from occurring and shift the narrative towards PoS < PoW. Both Bitcoin and Ethereum using the same term also makes discussions contrasting the two less nuanced making it easier for people to grasp. It's also more of a technically correct and explicit term as producing valid blocks is what miners (validators) do.
ذیل میں کان کنی سے متعلق شرائط ہیں جن کو ہمیں تبدیل کرنا چاہیے:
Bitcoin mining pools = Bitcoin validator pools
Bitcoin miners = Bitcoin جائیدادوں
Bitcoin mining = Bitcoin توثیق کرنا
خلاصہ
In summary, re-framing PoW mining to PoW validating will benefit bitcoin long term by preventing the framing effect from occurring which is a cognitive bias where people decide on options based on whether the options are presented with positive or negative connotations.
کان کنی = منفی مفہوم۔
توثیق = مثبت مفہوم (شکریہ ایتھریم)۔
This is a guest post by Doc Sharp. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin میگزین.
اصل ذریعہ: Bitcoin میگزین