By Bitcoinist - 1 yil oldin - O'qish vaqti: 4 daqiqa
Jimmi Song va Samson Mou va boshqalar. Vitalik Buterin, LABITCONF da Battle Royale
The fact that Jimmy Song and Samson Mow were in the same bill as Vitalik Buterin was interesting enough, but the actual panel was the equivalent of an atomic bomb blowing the stage up. What started as a discussion about the FTX collapse and saga, turned into a heated debate about bitcoin Vs. Ethereum pretty quickly. It was a spectacle. And Song and Mow ensembled into some kind of bitcoin killing machine right before our eyes.
Biroq, boshidan boshlaylik.
Besides the already mentioned characters, Ripio’s Juan Llanos and Kraken’s Alejandro Palantzas completed the panel. The moderators were Rodolfo Andragnes and Diego Gutiérrez Zaldívar, Co-founder of the Bitcoin Argentina NGO. At first, Llanos tried to explain the FTX saga in a polite way. It was a stressful situation and mistakes were made, he said. However, Samson Mow wasn’t having it. “The main problem is that they built their business on a sh*tcoin,” he said. Vitalik laughed. Everything was fine.
"The main problem is that they built their business on a shitcoin", explains @Excellion atrofida #FTX's collapse at the main stage of @labitconf
Ularga ayting, boshliq! #LABITCONF @JAN3com @BFXLeosESP pic.twitter.com/WIcvVSL0gU
— Xaver ₿astardo @ (@criptobastardo) Noyabr 11, 2022
Mowning so'zlariga ko'ra, "bu tartibga soluvchilar bilan hech qanday aloqasi yo'q edi. FTX regulyatorlar bilan chuqur to'shakda edi ", bu ajoyib nuqta. Sem Bankman-Frid butun kripto sanoatini tartibga soluvchilar uchun qulayroq qilish uchun hukumatga murojaat qilishning yuzi edi. Bu harakat hozir qayerda turibdi? Shundan so'ng, Jimmi Song yanada yuqoriga ko'tarilib, ha, bularning barchasi sodir bo'ldi, lekin haqiqiy muammo markazlashtirilgan xizmatlardan vasiy sifatida foydalanishda ekanligini aytdi. Qadimgi maqol aytganidek: Sizning kalitlaringiz emas, tangalaringiz emas.
Hozircha hammasi yaxshi. Ammo havoda allaqachon keskinlik bor edi ...
Jimmi Song va Samson Mou va boshqalar. Vitalik Buterin
Finally, it was Vitalik’s turn. He criticized Bankman-Fried’s megalomania and compared the FTX billboards and the stadium naming to the behavior of dictators from the last century. Vitalik explained how the FTT racket worked, and Samson Mow dropped the bomb. Mow said that a lot of what Vitalik was saying also applies to Ethereum and all hell broke loose.
Moderator Diego Gutierrez Zaldivar diqqatini FTXga qaratishga harakat qildi, ammo u muvaffaqiyatsizlikka uchradi. Mushuk sumkadan chiqib ketdi. Gutierrez Zaldivar Samson Moudan "sh*tcoin" ta'rifini so'radi va sobiq Blockstream hozirgina Ethereum va uning ishlashini tasvirlab berdi, Vitalik esa ishonchsizlik bilan kuzatdi. "Sh*tcoinlar bilan bog'liq muammo shundaki, ular Amazonda ishlayotganda o'zlarini markazlashtirilmagandek ko'rsatadilar va hech kim tugunni boshqara olmaydi."
'Shitcoin' definition, by @Excellion @ @labitconf #LABITCONF @JAN3com pic.twitter.com/CYIeSKTcCA
— Xaver ₿astardo @ (@criptobastardo) Noyabr 11, 2022
Jimmi Songning so'zlariga ko'ra, FTXning qulashi haqiqiy saboq shundaki, odamlar o'z-o'zini himoya qilishlari va o'zlarining operatsiyalarini tekshirishlari kerak. Song, Altkoinlarga ishonish va tasdiqlamaslik madaniyatini tanqid qildi. "Siz o'zingizning narsalaringizni qanday tekshirishni o'rganishingiz kerak va agar siz bu saboqni o'rganmasangiz, hammangiz halokatga uchraysiz. Bu vaqt masalasidir”.
Since it was two against one, Gutiérrez Zaldívar took it upon himself to protect Vitalik and Ethereum. He didn’t do a very good job. He gave Alejandro Palantzas the word and Palantzas said there’s a reason companies like Kraken and Coinbase are still in business 10 years later. They have resisted the temptation to print their own token or “sh*tcoin,” and “they didn’t do it because it’s morally wrong.” According to Palantzas, all the scammers in the space don’t understand what bitcoin albatta. Bitcoin “is freedom, it’s liberty.”
Bitstampda 11 yil uchun BTC narxlari jadvali | Manba: BTC/USD TradingView.comMow Altcoin dunyosini kazino bilan solishtiradi
When Samson Mow defined “sh*tcoins,” he said that they advertised themself as decentralized when they had an obvious issuer. Vitalik challenged him asking if Satoshi was bitcoin’s issuer. Mow responded that what Satoshi did was set up a number of rules that a lot of people followed, which is not the same as being a central issuer. Neither Mow nor Song stated the obvious, that Satoshi is not among us while Vitalik and other altcoin CEOs are. And their influence over the protocols they preside over is immense.
Vitalik o'zining eng katta zarbasini oddiy odamlarga o'z-o'zini saqlashni qulay qilish haqida gapirar ekan. U olomonni yoqtiradigan yo'lni bosib o'tdi va buni amalga oshirish uchun butun sanoat birgalikda ishlashi kerakligini aytdi va jamoatchilik portladi. Mowning aytishicha, mashhur e'tiqoddan farqli o'laroq, o'z-o'zini himoya qilish oson edi. Odamlar faqat apparat hamyonining ko'rsatmalariga amal qilishlari kerak. Jimmi Song uzoqroqqa bordi va agar odamlar kuch sarflashni va bir nechta narsalarni o'rganishni istamasalar, ular "o'z-o'zini suveren pulga" loyiq emasligini aytdi.
Bundan tashqari, Song Ethereum yaratuvchisining tomog'iga "Bilaman, siz buni eshitishni xohlamaysiz, pulingizni Vitalikga bermoqchi ekanligingizni bilaman". Bunga Vitalik hatto pulini ham Vitalikga ishonmasligini aytdi va o'zining 4/6 ko'p sig'imli hamyonini sozlashni tushuntirdi. Bu kulgili edi, lekin haqiqiy savoldan qochdi. U Ethereum markazidami yoki yo'qmi?
Noqulay, ammo juda qiziqarli panelni tugatish uchun Gutierres Zaldivar kechaning eng katta zarbasi bilan yakunladi. Uning so'zlariga ko'ra, ochiq savollar hamma uchun o'ylashi kerak, "chunki bizda haqiqat yo'q, biz faqat fikrlash tarzimiz bilan o'rtoqlashamiz".
Xo'sh, siz nima deb o'ylaysiz?
Featured Image: Song, Mow, and Buterin at LABITCONF, by Ed. Prospero | Charts by TradingViewAsl manba: Bitcoinist