Peter Schiff Kim Kardashian'ı Tartışırken Kendinden Utanıyor, M. Saylor'u Suçluyor

By Bitcoinist - 1 yıl önce - Okuma Süresi: 4 dakika
4 Eki 2022 Sal 8:41

Peter Schiff Kim Kardashian'ı Tartışırken Kendinden Utanıyor, M. Saylor'u Suçluyor

This might be Peter Schiff’s weirdest take, and the man’s got a few. While commenting on Kim Kardashian’s recent deal with the SEC, the gold bug fired at “the real pumpers”… Michael Saylor? and… CNBC? Did Peter Schiff and his team even do basic research about Kim Kardashian’s case? Or is he playing dumb, attacking his perceived enemies, and muddying the waters? For Peter Schiff’s sake let’s hope it’s the second option, because what he wrote was downright embarrassing. 

SEC cezalandırıyor @KimKardashian pompalama için 1.2 milyon $ #kripto. Peki ya gerçek pompacılar? @saylor Kim'den daha fazla kripto kazanmak için çok daha fazlasına sahipti. Veya @CNBC kripto şirketlerinin reklamları için milyonlar ödedi, ardından pompaladı #Bitcoin endüstri pompacılarına yayın süresi sağlarken kesintisiz mi?

- Peter Schiff (@PeterSchiff) Tarafından Çekilen En Yeni Fotoğrafları İncele 3 Ekim 2022

Peter Schiff’s exact words were: “The SEC is fining Kim Kardashian $1.2 million for pumping crypto. What about the real pumpers? Saylor had much more to gain pumping crypto than Kim. Or CNBC paid millions for ads by crypto companies, then pumping Bitcoin non-stop while providing industry pumpers with airtime?” Wow. When newcomers to the space mix bitcoin and crypto, it’s often an honest mistake. Peter Schiff, however, writes about bitcoin every day of his life. Could he be this out of the loop? Or does he have a hidden agenda?

Her şeyden önce, Kim Kardashian did settle with the SEC for $1.2 million. The accusation was specifically about an alleged scam called EthereumMax. Apparently, she didn’t disclose the payment she got for the promotion. According to our coverage, Kim K “agreed to pay $1.26 million in penalties, including her promotional payment for EthereumMax. In addition, the socialite agreed to stop promoting “crypto securities” for the coming three years and to cooperate with the SEC’s ongoing investigation.”

That’s the case in a nutshell. It has nothing to do with bitcoin or Saylor. And you can be sure that CNBC discloses all of the payments they get for crypto ads. So, what is Peter Schiff even talking about?

The MicroStrategy mastermind cevap with a basic lesson: “Bitcoin is a commodity, not a security. Advocating a commodity is similar to promoting steel, aluminum, concrete, glass, or granite. The BTC network is an open protocol, offering utilitarian benefits similar to roads, rails, radio, telephone, television, internet, or english.” This should be common knowledge, but it isn’t. A self-proclaimed expert like Peter Schiff should know all about it, though. It’s literally his job.

#Bitcoin bir menkul kıymet değil, bir emtiadır. Bir ürünü savunmak çelik, alüminyum, beton, cam veya granitin reklamını yapmaya benzer. BTC ağı, karayolları, demiryolları, radyo, telefon, televizyon, internet veya ingilizceye benzer faydacı faydalar sunan açık bir protokoldür.

— Michael Saylor (@saylor) 3 Ekim 2022

Notice that Saylor didn’t mention gold, Peter Schiff’s bread and butter. When a Twitter user pressed him on the similarities between him shilling gold and Saylor bitcoin, Schiff responded: “My recommending gold is not the same as bitcoin owners looking to sell pumping bitcoin.  I don’t sell any gold that I own. I sell retail, then buy wholesale on behalf of customers. Also my advocacy of gold has no effect on its price.” Is he implying that Saylor sells his bitcoin and moves the market with his tweets? Because those are two lies.

My recommending #gold aynı değil bitcoin owners looking to sell pumping #bitcoin. I don't sell any gold that I own. I sell retail, then buy wholesale on behalf of customers. Also my advocacy of gold has no effect on its price

- Peter Schiff (@PeterSchiff) Tarafından Çekilen En Yeni Fotoğrafları İncele 3 Ekim 2022

İşin gerçeği şu ki bitcoin is a commodity and not a security. That’s not an opinion. That’s the SEC’s official stance on the matter.

Plus, Saylor was not paid by a third party. Bitcoin is actually decentralized and doesn’t have a marketing budget, much less an owner.

Bitcoin is not crypto. And Peter Schiff should know that.

İsim tanıma bitcoin MicroStrategy'ye getirilenler satın alınamaz. Saylor, "Bizi gerçekten görmezden gelemezler" dedi. Bitcoin şirket için "pazarlama ve satışta bir fayda" ve "net bir olumlu" oldu. Aslında bunu “çığlık atmak” olarak nitelendiriyor. homehissedarlar adına koşuyoruz.”

Orjinal kaynak: Bitcoinolduğunu