By Bitcoin Jurnal - 4 oy oldin - O'qish vaqti: 5 daqiqa
Ishlab chiquvchilar siz uchun ishlamaydi
I have a feeling that I am going to be writing a lot on this topic in general for the foreseeable future, but the philosophical and existential crisis currently confronting the Bitcoin space over what constitutes “spam” is starting to have massive second order effects and consequences in all of the different Bitcoin jamoalar.
I want to specifically focus on the reaction to this debate spilling over into what charitably can be construed as debating with Core developers, but in reality in most cases has taken the form of what can only be called harassment. This can be a very nuanced and subtle aspect of how Bitcoin works, as the relationship between “customers” that actually utilize Bitcoin and the developers that work to maintain, improve, and optimize the protocol and tools built on top of it is not a clear cut category separation. Many people who use Bitcoin are developers, and many developers are users of Bitcoin. There is no hard line distinguishing between the two, and someone who is one or the other can over time become both. In the same regard people who fall into both categories could cease to do so, and simply become solely a developer or solely a user. That is the first thing to understand, the line between users and developers is totally arbitrary, with constant overlap and the potential for that overlap to grow and shrink at any time.
Ya'ni, dasturchi bo'lmagan foydalanuvchilar haqida nima deyish mumkin? Ularning dasturiy ta'minotni yozayotgan va qo'llab-quvvatlovchi odamlar bilan aloqasi qanday? Haqiqiy qora va oq aniq javob yo'q, lekin men sizga munosabatlar nima emasligini ayta olaman: ish beruvchi / xodim munosabatlari.
Ishlab chiquvchilar biz uchun ishlamaydi. Nuqta. Ular bizning xodimlarimiz emas. Biz ularning to'lovlarini to'lamaymiz, biz ularning ishini moliyalamaymiz, ular biz uchun hech qanday shartnoma yoki qonuniy majburiyatlarga ega emas. Biz mahsulot menejeri emasmiz, biz ularga loyihaning yo'l xaritasini bermaymiz va ular qanday qismlar ustida ishlashlari, ular ustida qanday ishlashlari, qanday tartibda yoki bu qismlar qanday bo'lishi kerakligi yoki qanday ishlashi kerakligini aytib beramiz.
Disabuse yourself of any notion that this ecosystem functions in any way remotely like that. It does not. Developers freely choose to contribute their time to an open source protocol completely on their own terms. They decide how much time to spend, what to spend it on, and the way they actually implement what they chose to work on. Full stop. They have complete and unfettered autonomy in every way regarding how they interact with Bitcoin as a project.
Now turn that around to look at users. Users of Bitcoin are under no obligation whatsoever to adopt a change or tool that developers produce. Nothing is forcing users to change the software they run, or adopt a new tool developers build on top of Bitcoin. Having a Netflix subscription does not obligate you to watch a single piece of content they produce, it does not obligate you to consume any specific volume of content. You can watch as much or as little as you choose to, you can even cancel your subscription if you want. Netflix has literally no control over how you interact with it whatsoever except purely through the power of voluntary persuasion.
Bu shunday Bitcoin works. Harassing developers on GitHub will not change that. It will not magically turn your relationship with developers into one of an employee/employer. Not only will crying on GitHub accomplish nothing whatsoever to create or bring about that power dynamic that many Bitcoiners seem to want to bring into existence, but u hech qanday samarali natija bermaydi. Men yillar davomida ishlab chiquvchilar bilan ko'plab masalalarni shaxsan muhokama qilgan odam sifatida aytamanki, ishlab chiquvchilar biron bir masala yoki harakat rejasi bo'yicha noto'g'ri ekanligini ko'p marta ta'kidlagan, ular buni eng maqbul deb bilishadi.
GitHub is not the place for arguing what the existential purpose or reason for Bitcoin existing is. It’s a place for narrow concept and implementation debate and criticism, Har qanday texnik taklifni takomillashtirish maqsadida. Whether that leads to a proposal being incorporated into Bitcoin, or rejected from Bitcoin, butunlay mantiqiy va mantiqiy muhokamalar natijasiga bog'liq bo'lishi kerak.
Haqiqatan ham mantiqiy dalil yoki ma'lumotga ega bo'lgan taqdirda ham, siz haqiqatan ham qo'shilib, rivojlanish jarayoniga doimiy ravishda hissa qo'shasizmi yoki qatnashasizmi? Yoki siz shunchaki ma'lum bir muammoni ko'rib chiqish yoki kiritish orqali uni velosipedda haydash uchun harakat qilyapsizmi? Ha? Shunda hatto mantiqiy dalil bo'lsa ham, GitHub bu muhokamalar uchun mos joy emas. Bizda Twitter, Reddit, Spaces bor, munozaralar va masalalar bo'yicha konsensusga erishish uchun ko'plab boshqa joylar mavjud. semantika haqidagi bema'nilik va falsafiy bahslarni rivojlanish jarayoniga faol aralashtirmasdan.
And I reiterate that I am a person who has spent a massive amount of time in this space making arguments about why a specific direction of development is or isn’t a good idea, bolstering those arguments with actual reasoning and logical rationale. I probably never will in any meaningful and consistent way contribute to the development of Bitcoin, shuning uchun men o'z dalillarim, fikrlarim va g'oyalarimni to'g'ridan-to'g'ri rivojlanish jarayoniga kiritishga harakat qilmayman.
Men bu dalillarni kengroq hamjamiyatga yoki ularni ishlab chiquvchilarga taqdim etganda, GitHub yoki o'ziga xos maqsadi va funksiyasi bo'lgan platformalardan tashqari boshqa forumlar yoki vositalarda keltiraman. Dasturchilar to coordinate the development process. If my arguments actually hold merit, they will convince users. They will convince developers out of band from places like GitHub. Eventually, an argument with merit will grow and create consensus around it to the point that it presents a meaningful public signal that developers can choose, if they want, to incorporate into their own reasoning around Bitcoin and what they choose to spend their time and efforts doing to improve it.
Oxir oqibat, ushbu muammolarga va ushbu dinamikaga ishlab chiquvchilar yoki foydalanuvchilar nuqtai nazaridan qarashingiz muhim emas: sizda ishontirish kuchidan boshqa hech qanday kuch yoki ta'sir yo'q.
Agar ishlab chiquvchilar foydalanuvchilarning aksariyati istamaydigan yoki hech qanday qiymat topa olmaydigan narsalarni ishlab chiqarsa, ular buni e'tiborsiz qoldirishlari mumkin. Agar ishlab chiquvchilar foydalanuvchilarning ko'pchiligi rag'batlantiruvchi moslashuv, muhandislik haqiqatlari yoki shunga o'xshash narsalar nuqtai nazaridan mutlaqo mantiqsiz bo'lgan narsani talab qilishsa, ular shunchaki ularga e'tibor bermasliklari mumkin.
Bitcoin is a self regulating system. Bad tools produced by developers will not be adopted. Users demanding incoherent or damaging things cannot make developers build that for them, but they can step up and build it themselves if they albatta, shuni xohlayman. Bu dinamikada hech kim boshqa hech kim uchun ishlamaydi, bu bozor kuchlari tomonidan tartibga solinadigan butunlay ixtiyoriy jarayon. Shunday qilib, yo harakat qiling va haqiqatda ishontirishga harakat qiling, buni o'zingiz qiling yoki ko'proq yig'lang. Hech kimni o'zi istamagan ishni qilishga majburlashda muvaffaqiyat qozonolmaysiz.
You can find the fork button in the top right corner right Bu yerga.
Asl manba: Bitcoin jurnal